11 Lessons Trial Lawyers Can Learn From Jay Z’s Lawyer Video Presentation
On Monday, Jay-Z's lawyer, Alex Spiro, held a press conference to address allegations against the rapper to publicly dispute rape claims and clarify the situation. Although the statement's purpose was evident—protecting his client and trying to influence public perception—several visual presentation errors can offer essential insights for legal communications in and out of the courtroom. I am not personally acquainted with Mr. Shapiro, but his firm, Quinn Emanuel et al., has been a client. Overall, I believe he performed exceptionally well and commend his assertive defense. It essentially acknowledges that Jay-Z faces a more significant threat to his reputation than
The First Amendment on Trial: Factors that Influence Juror Receptivity
When the First Amendment was ratified in the U.S. Constitution over 200 years ago, it aimed to prevent government overreach by safeguarding free speech and other individual liberties. Since then, it has been warped into the right to say whatever you want without consequences. This has coincided with a shift from using the First Amendment to protect minority viewpoints to a more conservative perspective that believes political correctness has gone too far. Since the rise of the MAGA movement in 2016, supporters have become vocal advocates of free speech, citing concerns about media bias and online censorship. But political rhetoric
New DOAR Study Reveals Generational Divide in Attitudes Toward Trade Secret Protection
Report Shows Younger Professionals More Accepting of Trade Secret Sharing, While Occupation and Gender Significantly Impact Views on Intellectual Property Rights December 05, 2024, New York, NY — DOAR, the nation’s leading trial consulting company, today released findings from a comprehensive study examining attitudes toward trade secret protection and intellectual property rights across major IP litigation venues. The survey revealed significant generational and demographic differences in how potential jurors view the retention and sharing of confidential and technical information, with implications for both litigation strategy and corporate policy. The report, “A Study of Jurors’ Attitudes Toward Theft of Trade Secrets