By Dr. Ken Broda-Bahm: At a national conference I spoke at earlier this week, one of the other presenters was  Anne Marie O’Brien of Smith Pauley LLP, a very experienced litigator and mediator working out of Omaha, Nebraska. During her talk, she asked a room full of defense attorneys how many of them routinely made the … Defendants, Don’t Automatically Avoid the First Move in Settlement Read More »

By Ken Broda-Bahm: It hasn’t been the easiest year for America’s railroad companies. Last Fall, in the midst of an inflationary panic, a national rail strike threatened to disrupt the nation’s shipping system, before that was resolved through a combination of Presidential carrots and sticks. But that was all eclipsed just a few months later, … Expect Skepticism (and Some Support) for Railroads Read More »

By Dr. Ken Broda-Bahm: Persuasion is at the core of what litigators do, not exclusively, but particularly in court. Despite that, aspiring lawyers train on a legal model that emphasizes some aspects of persuasion (like evidence and logic) while de-emphasizing or ignoring other aspects (like emotion, salience, and motivation). In a recent article, “Persuasion Principles … Model Effective Legal Persuasion Read More »

By Dr. Ken Broda-Bahm: A mock trial is not a crystal ball with access to the ultimate result you’re going to see in a real trial. There are too many differences between the research situation and the full trial setting for those results to be considered reliable, including the individual make-up of the panel, the … Trust Your Mock Trial (to a Point) Read More »

By Dr. Ken Broda-Bahm: To be clear, testifying isn’t acting. Testifying is telling the truth. And with apologies to those who will point out that good acting is telling the truth as well, there are some important differences for the testifying witness, not least of which is that any appearance of artifice reduces credibility. Even … Witnesses, You’re Preparing for Improv, Not a Play Read More »

By Dr. Ken Broda-Bahm: Everyone supports safety. The popular “Reptile” approach to trying plaintiffs’ cases is built on the strength of safety as a core value. It is a common sense attitude to prefers greater security over greater risk. But there is also an extreme version of that attitude – a version that tolerates zero … Voir Dire for “Safetyist” Attitudes  Read More »

By Dr. Ken Broda-Bahm: Are jurors going to  believe someone paid to come into the courtroom and deliver an opinion that supports the side who’s paying? While the jurors’ assent may not be as automatic as the experts and their clients hope it would be, in courtrooms every day and across the country, jurors do follow … Experts, Shoot Back at ‘Hired Gun’ Assumptions Read More »

By Dr. Ken Broda-Bahm: I don’t know if anything has ever in such a short time moved from being a pretty esoteric science topic to being a concern on everyone’s lips… but ChatGPT could probably tell me. With literally billions of uses per month, the artificial intelligence-driven chatbot has captured our attention and created a mix of excitement and dread. It has become a cliche to talk about how dramatic the shift will be as the technology moves toward displacing tasks like writing and customer service. It is also a cliche to talk about how the “jury is still out” on

By Dr. Ken Broda-Bahm: It is a jury’s first task: Pick a foreperson, someone who will lead the discussion, help the group walk through the evidence, and work their way to a decision. Who gets picked? The person who is experienced at being a juror? The person who holds a leadership role in their work life? The person who is the most knowledgeable or intelligent? The answer from the research is that it is none of those. What best predicts the emergence of leaders in a small group is talkativeness. In other words, the person who speaks the most, regardless

By Dr. Ken Broda-Bahm: It’s been a season of some firsts: An ex-President, and the leading candidate for a major party nomination, has been criminally indicted (twice so far), and found civilly liable for defamation (once and counting). Rather than mounting a substantive defense, the candidate and ex-official has used the remaining ‘bully pulpit’ to repeatedly attack both the civil and criminal justice systems as well as those who work within them. To many of us, these daily attacks might seem so exaggerated and so self-serving that they can’t possibly be gaining traction. But they are. After bringing a majority of his