Humor is a funny thing. A joke that works so well out of one person’s mouth can crash and burn out of another’s.  That same joke can cause hysterical laughter in one situation and groans of annoyance or gasps of affront in another.  Content, person, delivery, circumstance, audience – it’s a tough set of variables to juggle in a courtroom setting.  Here’s a cautionary tale we witnessed first-hand:  Plaintiff counsel came in quite late to a Los Angeles court one morning at the end of a month-long trial.  The full jury was already seated, and was being read the jury instructions.  Counsel says, “You’d think after a month I’d be used to LA traffic!”    The comment might have gotten a few chuckles (maybe) under different circumstances, but this jury just stared, very much unamused. 

You know how to frame a great closing argument.  You know how to deliver it to a jury.  But in our experience, the real hurdle arises when you take that great argument and great delivery and try to incorporate technology.  Which you certainly should!  With juries these days, you need to channel a Steve Jobs product launch as much as a Perry Mason trial.  Yet, in doing so, you introduce potentially unpracticed skills and tools, and place your reliance on an extra variable: the tech itself.  Including slides changes the way you’ll need to prepare and rehearse your closing argument.  Think about Jobs revealing a brand-new product.  The cadence was so smooth, the

No sugar-coating it:  the defense weaknesses we discussed in Part 2 are dangerous.  If you don’t have solid, convincing responses to them, you’re looking at significant challenges for your case outcome.  Finding the best solutions will, as always, depend on the specifics of your case.  However, because plaintiffs’ main arguments (and jurors’ reactions to them) are common and have broad applications, there are a number of important steps you can take every time:  Ask Yourself the Important Questions – and Answer Honestly 1. What are your case facts?  How thorough was your testing?  Was there evidence of a problem?  Did you warn sufficiently?   If there was an issue, how quickly did you respond?  What did

Now that we’ve covered how jurors tend to think about health and safety products liability cases (Part 1), let’s examine the 4 common plaintiff themes that can cause major trouble for the defense:  1. You Favored Profits Over People This argument tends to be the crux of the plaintiff narrative.  And rightly so – these cases offer plentiful opportunities for plaintiffs to blur the lines between business and financial decisions.  Plaintiffs will suggest to jurors that money is the driving factor behind your client’s actions, not the safety of its consumers.  They can also point to less-than-ideal company documents (there always seem to be a few…) that discuss the

When it comes to medical and safety products liability, the defense is inherently at risk.  While we’ve basically seen it all from plaintiffs, where human safety is concerned, a defendant tends to be vulnerable to a common set of plaintiff arguments.  But under the circumstances, in some ways this is actually good news.  At least if you know what to expect from your opponent and from jurors, you can try to do something about it.  The best way to begin to counter weaknesses in litigation is first to understand why the weaknesses exist.  So, here in Part 1, we’ll take a look at the elements that combine to give plaintiffs such an advantage in these cases.  Then, in Part

When it comes to medical and safety products liability, the defense is inherently at risk.  While we’ve basically seen it all from plaintiffs, where human safety is concerned, a defendant tends to be vulnerable to a common set of plaintiff arguments.  But under the circumstances, in some ways this is actually good news.  At least if you know what to expect from your opponent and from jurors, you can try to do something about it.  The best way to begin to counter weaknesses in litigation is first to understand why the weaknesses exist.  So, here in Part 1, we’ll take a look at the elements that combine to give plaintiffs such an advantage in these cases.  Then, in Part

Over the last 23 years, I’ve attended plenty of mediations with clients to help them prepare and present their mediation presentation.  But from what I’ve seen, there’s not much actual mediation going on.  Instead, it usually goes something like this:  Mediator:  You never know what you’re going to get with some crazy jury, so your best bet is to settle this here with me.  Would each side like to make an opening statement?  Plaintiff:  We know what a jury will do.  We’re going to kick your butt.  Defense:  No, we know what a jury will do, and we’re going to kick your butt.  (Both sides adjourn to separate rooms and eat M&Ms.  Mediator’s corns get worse going

At our recent all-firm meeting, the topic of travel came up; not surprising, given that most of our team covers a lot of ground each year.  Soon enough, we all began sharing our favorite travel tips, and were pleased to discover a few that even our hardened LI “road warriors” hadn’t heard of.  Given that our average reader is no stranger to airports either, we thought we’d share our best travel tips here, in the hopes they make your life a little easier as you travel the friendly skies. Top 10 Travel Tips Stay Charged.  If you’ve got a lengthy flight where you hope to get a lot of work done, try to book an aircraft that has AC electrical outlets available for the cabin.  When booking flights online, airlines will list